Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Rodriguez v. Lee
as 23-557
Petitioner / Appellant:
Marcos Rodriguez
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden William Lee, as superintendent Eastern Correctional Facility
Dixon v. Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility
as 1:2020cv02389
Petitioner:
John Dixon
Respondent:
Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sorodsky v. Keyser et al
as 1:2019cv05389
Petitioner:
MICHAIL SORODSKY
Respondent:
Wende Correctional Facility, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Woodbourne Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Ferguson v. Griffin
as 18-755
Petitioner - Appellant:
Andre Ferguson, DIN# 09A6083,Eastern Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 338, Napanoch, NY 12458
Respondent - Appellee:
T. Griffin, Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility
Hamilton v. Superintendent, Eastern NY. Co
as 17-2145
Petitioner - Appellant:
Eugene Hamilton
Respondent - Appellee:
Eastern Correctional Facility
Dockery v. Lee, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility
as 1:2015cv07866
Petitioner:
Alexander Dockery
Respondent:
William Lee, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evans v. Larkin
as 14-1688
Petitioner - Appellant:
William Anthony Evans
Respondent - Appellee:
Roland Larkin, Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility and Raymond A. Tierney
Benjamin v. Griffin
as 14-1656
Petitioner - Appellant:
Billie Benjamin
Respondent - Appellee:
T. Griffin, Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility
Martinez v. Superintendent of Eastern Corr
as 14-1513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Martinez
Defendant - Appellee:
Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility
Hernandez v. Larkin
as 14-1185
Petitioner - Appellant:
Carlos Hernandez
Respondent - Appellee:
Roland Larkin, Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
