Cases 21 - 30 of 32
MAY v. TYLWALK et al
as 2:2014cv01340
Plaintiff:
FREEMAN W. MAY
Defendant:
JOHN C. TYLWALK, ROBERT J. EBY, BRADFORD H. CHARLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION v. AMOS EBY COMPANY, INC.
as 5:2013cv06977
Plaintiff:
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Defendant:
AMOS EBY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
EBY v. COLVIN
as 5:2013cv06243
Plaintiff:
TROY K. EBY
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Negron v. Bickell et al
as 1:2013cv01568
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Negron
Defendant:
Tabb Bickell, Richard S. Ellers, Connie Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lennon v. Fortson et al
as 3:2012cv00929
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jason Lennon
Defendant:
Shawn E. Fortson, James Nelson, Vernon Spillman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lennon v. Lawler et al
as 3:2011cv00503
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jason Lennon
Defendant:
Jon D. Fisher, Corbin, B Hollinbange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LENNON v. CAWLER et al
as 2:2011cv00007
Plaintiff:
AARON JASON LENNON
Defendant:
CAWLER, FISHER, COOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIELS et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv03248
Plaintiff:
REBECCA DANIELS , NORMA EBY , MICHAEL GIBSON and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brooks v. Judiciary of Lebanon County et al
as 3:2009cv01264
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Judiciary of Lebanon County, Bradford Charles and Robert Eby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EBY-BROWN COMPANY LLC v. UNITED EGG PRODUCERS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv05167
Plaintiff:
EBY-BROWN COMPANY LLC
Defendant:
UNITED EGG PRODUCERS, INC., UNITED EGG ASSOCIATION, UNITED STATES EGG MARKETERS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
