Cases 1 - 10 of 28
WILLIAMS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
EDDIE WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Eddie Williams
as 23-12968
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EDDIE WILLIAMS
Eddie Williams, Jr.In re: Eddie Williams, Jr.
as 23-11052
Petitioner:
In re: EDDIE WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Melvin Robertson v. Raphael Warnock, et al
as 21-14481
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN ROBERTSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RAPHAEL G. WARNOCK, SONNY PERDUE, Individual and Official Capacity, THURBERT BAKER, Individual and Official Capacity and others
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03048
Plaintiff:
EDDIE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCAPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATTERSON v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
ROLONDA PATTERSON
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY, PHOEBE PHYSICIANS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv20912
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Warnock et al
as 1:2021cv01468
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, Paul Guerrucci, Steven C. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03087
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv55246
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
