Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Martinez v. Rio Consumnes Correctional Center et al
as 2:2016cv02590
Plaintiff:
Edgar Martinez , Sr.
Defendant:
Rio Consumnes Correctional Center, David Rosas and Alex Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01930
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Edgar Martinez v. Orange Police Department et al
as 8:2015cv02098
Defendant:
City of Orange, County of Orange, DOES and others
Plaintiff:
Edgar Martinez
Martinez et al v. Flagstar Bank, FSB
as 2:2015cv01934
Plaintiff:
Edgar Martinez , Erika Martinez and Delfina Prado
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Holland
as 3:2013cv03007
Petitioner:
Edgar Martinez
Respondent:
K. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Barns
as 2:2012cv02975
Petitioner:
Edgar Martinez
Respondent:
Ron Barns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edgar Martinez-Mares v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv07645
Petitioner:
Edgar Martinez-Mares
Respondent:
United States of America
Edgar Martinez v. American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00991
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc, Does and K & L Mortgage
Plaintiff:
Edgar Martinez
Aguilar et al v. Rumi Construction et al
as 3:2007cv00272
Plaintiff:
Raul Aguilar, Raul Aguilar, Adan Infante and others
Defendant:
Rumi Construction, Amana Engineering and Construction Inc., Amana Engineering and Construction Inc. and others
Counter-claimant:
Oakland Unified School District, Oakland Unified School District, Amana Engineering and Construction Inc. and others
Counter-defendant:
David Ortega, Cuauhtemoc Palma, Hugo Pardo and others
Cross-claimant:
Amana Engineering and Construction Inc. and Amana Engineering and Construction Inc.
Cross-defendant:
HAMID GHAZANFARI, Rumi Construction and Oakland Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
