Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. et al v. Edible IP, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01524
Plaintiff:
1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. and 800-Flowers, Inc.
Defendant:
Edible IP, LLC and Edible Arrangements, LLC
Edible IP, LLC et al v. 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2022mc00094
Plaintiff:
Edible IP, LLC and Edible Arrangements, LLC
Defendant:
1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. and 800-Flowers, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
All Points Digital, LLC
Gomez v. Edible Arrangements, LLC
as 8:2022cv02690
Plaintiff:
Marissa Gomez
Defendant:
Edible Arrangements, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WORLD MEDIA GROUP, LLC v. EDIBLE ARRANGEMENTS, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
WORLD MEDIA GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
EDIBLE ARRANGEMENTS, LLC, EDIBLE BRANDS, LLC, EDIBLE ARRANGEMENTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. doing business as EDIBLE ARRANGEMENTS INTERNATIONAL, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Card Isle Corporation v. Farid et al
as 1:2021cv01971
Plaintiff:
Card Isle Corporation
Defendant:
Tariq Farid, Netsolace, Inc. and Edible Arrangements LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00427
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edible IP, LLC et al v. World Media Group, LLC
as 3:2020cv19178
Plaintiff:
Edible IP, LLC and EDIBLE ARRANGEMENTS LLC
Defendant:
WORLD MEDIA GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
