Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Davis et al v. C.B. Fleet Company, Inc.
as 1:2010sp80027
Plaintiff:
Sharon Davis and Edward Davis
Defendant:
C.B. Fleet Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company et al
as 2:2009cv06329
Defendant:
American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, Insurance Company of the State of PA, Lexington Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Davis and Edward Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Bullard et al v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company et al
as 1:2008cv00724
Plaintiff:
John G. Alexander, Clarence Edward Batts, Sr., Elnora Bell and others
Defendant:
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, Dow Chemical Company, Koppers Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
DAVIS, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86553
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD DAVIS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DAVIS v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2008cv86874
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD DAVIS
Defendant:
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DAVIS v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv82386
Plaintiff:
EDWARD DAVIS
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, ABER INSULATION, ABNEY MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bullard et al v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company et al
as 1:2007cv06883
Plaintiff:
Virda Bell Bullard, John G. Alexander, Clarence Edward Batts, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, Koppers Industries, Inc., Koppers Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
