Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Day et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2023pq00949
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Ronald Day, Edward Day and Mildred Day
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States v. Day
as 22-7002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD DAY
DAY JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv58043
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GERALD EDWARD DAY JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06214
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
The Southern Company, et al v. Monroe County Employees', et al
as 19-90015
Respondent:
MONROE COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 149 PENSION FUND, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Petitioner:
EDWARD DAY, G. EDISON HOLLAND, THOMAS O. ANDERSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mesirov v. Fanning et al
as 1:2017cv01983
Plaintiff:
Judy Mesirov
Defendant:
Thomas A. Fanning , Art P. Beattie , Donald M. James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vinyard v. Fanning et al
as 1:2017cv00725
Plaintiff:
Jean Vinyard
Defendant:
Thomas A. Fanning , Arthur P. Beattie , Edward Day, VI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monroe County Employees' Retirement System v. The Southern Company et al
as 1:2017cv00241
Plaintiff:
Monroe County Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
The Southern Company , Thomas A. Fanning , Art P. Beattie and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
DAY v. WEBCO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
as 1:2016cv05629
Defendant:
WEBCO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
Plaintiff:
DAY and EDWARD DAY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
