Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mourice Neal El v. Michael Duggan
as 23-1656
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOURICE NEAL EL
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL DUGGAN and MICHAEL EDWARD DUGGAN
Direct Construction Services, et al v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 19-1808
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMMY DANIELS, CITY OF DETROIT, MI, RON CRAWFORD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY DRAKEFORD and DIRECT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC
DIRECT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2018cv12356
Defendant:
Michael Edward Duggan, Detroit Land Bank Authority, BOYSIE JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DRAKEFORD and DIRECT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Davis et al v. Wayne County Election Commission
as 2:2016cv12547
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis and Desmond M. White
Defendant:
Wayne County Election Commission
Intervenor:
Michael Edward Duggan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Taper v. Duggan et al
as 2:2014cv02547
Plaintiff:
Tomeka L. Taper
Defendant:
Nicholas Edward Duggan and Jack Key Auto Leasing, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brewer et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02767
Plaintiff:
Susan Brewer , Adlai Bell , William Burress and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brewer et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01473
Plaintiff:
Susan Brewer , Adlai Bell , William Burress and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brewer et al v. Deputy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as CAN/3:12-cv-01473
Plaintiff:
Susan Brewer , Adlai Bell , William Burress and others
Defendant:
Deputy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
