Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Fareed Sepehry-Fard v. Federal State and Local Corpora Ficta Employees et al
as 3:2017mc80061
Plaintiff:
Fareed Sepehry-Fard
Defendant:
Federal, State and Local Corpora Ficta Employee(s ), Lucy H. Koh, Edward J. Davila and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv02126
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Schuette v. Davila
as 4:2017cv00532
Plaintiff:
Chris L. Schuette
Defendant:
Edward J. Davila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shao v. Wang et al
as 5:2014cv01912
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao
Defendant:
Tsan-Kuen Wang, David Sussman, B.J. Fadem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimberly Alfriend, et al v. California Supreme Court, et al
as 14-15347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIMBERLY JANE ALFRIEND, ROBERT WARNER, DENNIS E. WIESSNER, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT, TANI CANTIL SAKAUYE, Chief Justice, California Supreme Court, GOODWIN LIU, Associate Justice, California Supreme Court and others
Jose Garcia, et al v. California Supreme Court, et al
as 14-15349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE J. GARCIA, MARINNA CALLAWAY, SUZY LEE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT, TANI CANTIL SAKAUYE, Chief Justice, California Supreme Court, GOODWIN LIU, Associate Justice, California Supreme Court and others
Garrison v. Davila et al
as 5:2013cv05862
Plaintiff:
Steve Garrison
Defendant:
Edward J. Davila, William H Orrick, Richard Seeborg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Giannini v. United States District Court f, et al
as 13-15440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ROBERT GIANNINI
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, JAMES WARE, Chief Judge, WILLIAM ALSUP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv02975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
