Cases 1 - 10 of 26
SANDERS v. KLEM
as 2:2010cv03445
Petitioner:
REGINALD SANDERS
Respondent:
EDWARD KLEM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BEATTIE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI MAHANOY et al
as 1:2008cv00622
Plaintiff:
Antonio S. Beattie
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Edward Klem, Barbara Mason and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BEATTIE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI MAHANOY et al
as 5:2008cv00575
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO S. BEATTIE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI MAHANOY, EDWARD KLEM, BARBARA MASON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mincy v. Klem et al
as 1:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
Hilton Karriem Mincy
Defendant:
Edward Klem, William C. Wetzel, Miknich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferrell v. Beard et al
as 3:2007cv01789
Plaintiff:
Bruce Ferrell
Defendant:
Jeffery Beard, PH.D., Edward Klem, Thomas Temperine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOZZELLI v. KLEM et al
as 2:2007cv03530
Petitioner:
MICHAEL BOZZELLI
Respondent:
EDWARD KLEM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Supples v. Burda et al
as 1:2007cv01560
Plaintiff:
Allen Jerome Supples
Defendant:
Gloria Burda, Kenneth Chmieliwski, Edward Klem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CEO v. KLEM
as 2:2007cv03177
Petitioner:
WALTER CEO
Respondent:
EDWARD KLEM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BARONI v. KLEM
as 2:2007cv02843
Petitioner:
MICHAEL BARONI
Respondent:
EDWARD KLEM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LOMBARD v. KLEM et al
as 2:2007cv02650
Petitioner:
GENE LOMBARD
Respondent:
EDWARD KLEM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
