Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Jacoby & Meyers, LLP et al v. The Presiding Justiceas of the
as 15-2608
Plaintiff:
Jacoby & Meyers USA, LLC, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated entities authorized to practice law in the State of New York
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jacoby & Meyers USA II, PLLC and Jacoby & Meyers Law Offices, LLP, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated entities authorized to practice Law in the State of New York
Defendant - Appellee:
The Presiding Justices of The First, Second, Third and Fourth Departments, Appellate Division Of The Supreme Court Of The State Of New York, Eric T. Schneiderman, Diane Maxwell Kearse, in her official capacity as Chief Counsel for the Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh and Thirteenth Judicial Districts and others
Defendant:
Peter Tom, Angela Mazzarelli, Richard T. Andrias and others
Neroni v. Peebles
as 14-3000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tatiana Neroni
Defendant - Appellee:
David E. Peebles, individually and in his capacity as U.S. Magistrate Judge, the U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York, Matthew Holmes, individually and in his capacity as judicial extern for David E. Peebles, Gary L. Sharpe, individually and in his capacity as Chief Judge, the U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York and others
Neroni v. Peebles et al
as 3:2014cv00584
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Neroni
Defendant:
David E. Peebles, Matthew Holmes, Gary L. Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maki v. State of New York
as 14-897
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frank D. Maki
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New York, State of New York Department of Health Office of Professional Medical Conduct, Justice Jonathan Lippman and others
Maki v. State of New York et al
as 3:2013cv01118
Plaintiff:
Frank D. Maki
Defendant:
State of New York, State of New York Department of Health Office of Professional Medical Conduct, Jonathan Lippman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
