Cases 1 - 10 of 10
POWELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14162
Plaintiff:
WARREN EDWARD POWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
POWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv34345
Plaintiff:
EDWARD POWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv78028
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW EDWARD POWELL
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31399
Plaintiff:
VICTOR EDWARD POWELL
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv90551
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv00785
Plaintiff:
Victor Edward Powell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Powell v. Holloway et al
as 7:2017cv01205
Plaintiff:
James Edward Powell
Defendant:
Jeffery Holloway and Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Dorning et al
as 5:2009cv01707
Petitioner:
John Edward Powell, Jr
Respondent:
Blake Dorning and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell v. Madison County Alabama
as 5:2009cv01705
Plaintiff:
John Edward Powell, Jr
Defendant:
Madison County Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Madison County, Alabama et al
as 5:2009cv00865
Plaintiff:
John Edward Powell, Jr
Defendant:
Madison County, Alabama, Madison County Detention Facility and E Patrick Hill
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
