Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Wang v. Necessity Retail REIT, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06456
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Necessity Retail REIT, Inc., Edward M. Weil, Jr., Lisa Kabnick and others
O'Dell v. Necessary Retail REIT, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06302
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Necessary Retail REIT, Inc., Michael Weil, Lisa Kabnick and others
Morales v. Beard, et al
as 1:2011cv00692
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Morales
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Region II Commissioner/Director John Doe, Jerald Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keys v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2010cv02487
Plaintiff:
Carrington A. Keys
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Luzerne County, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. RENDELL
as 2:2010cv01492
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. BOYD
Defendant:
EDWARD RENDELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Binkley v. Rendell et al
as 1:2010cv01245
Plaintiff:
Terry Binkley
Defendant:
Edward Rendell, Jeffrey A Beard, Dorina Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTGOMERY v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2010cv02157
Petitioner:
NILE MONTGOMERY
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, TOM CORBET, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Winston v. Rendell et al
as 1:2010cv00867
Plaintiff:
Michael Winston
Defendant:
Edward Rendell, Tom Corbett, Frank E Pawlowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAMBERT v. FOLINO
as 2:2010cv01339
Petitioner:
BERNARD LAMBERT
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO
Defendant:
TOM CORBETT, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GOVERNOR EDWARD RENDELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnakin v. Rendell et al
as 1:2010cv00604
Plaintiff:
Wayne A. Johnakin
Defendant:
Edward Rendell, Former Judge Joseph P. Braig and Thomas Corbett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
