Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Morales v. Beard, et al
as 1:2011cv00692
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Morales
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Region II Commissioner/Director John Doe, Jerald Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keys v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2010cv02487
Plaintiff:
Carrington A. Keys
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Luzerne County, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnakin v. Rendell et al
as 1:2010cv00604
Plaintiff:
Wayne A. Johnakin
Defendant:
Edward Rendell, Former Judge Joseph P. Braig and Thomas Corbett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKEON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2009cv04571
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MCKEON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, EDWARD RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2009cv03969
Petitioner:
PRESTON KELLY
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, EDWARD RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2009cv00750
Plaintiff:
DEMETRUS BAILEY
Defendant:
EDWARD RENDELL, THOMAS J. RIDGE, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ORT v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2008cv06041
Plaintiff:
JAMES ORT
Defendant:
EDWARD RENDELL and CATHERINE C. MC VEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NESMITH v. LENAHAM et al
as 2:2008cv05631
Plaintiff:
ANDREW NESMITH
Defendant:
JOHN T. LENAHAM, EMILY HEWITT, DALE CARLSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DARRAS v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2008cv04362
Plaintiff:
JAMES SPERO DARRAS
Defendant:
EDWARD RENDELL and JEFFREY A. BEARD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SALLEY v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2008cv00132
Plaintiff:
ALFONZO SALLEY
Defendant:
EDWARD RENDELL and JEFFREY A. BEARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
