Cases 1 - 10 of 941
Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. Nouveau Investments, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01266
Plaintiff:
Choice Hotels International, Inc.
Defendant:
Nouveau Investments, LLC, Edward Ly and Audrey Le
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hammock v. Shellenberger et al
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
Terrence Edward Hammock
Defendant:
Scott Shellenberger, States Attorney Michael Fuller and States Attorney Michelle Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. Clayton
as 1:2024cv01158
Plaintiff:
Tommy Day
Defendant:
Cory Edward Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01188
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Edwards v. United States of America et al
as 8:2024cv01119
Plaintiff:
Daesja Edwards
Defendant:
United States of America and Reuel Marquez Lara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 US as Defendant
Witherspoon v. Weber
as 1:2024cv01084
Petitioner:
Edward Witherspoon
Respondent:
Warden Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kellam, Jr. v. Aimbridge Hospitality, LLC
as 1:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Kellam, Jr.
Defendant:
Aimbridge Hospitality, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carter v. Butler et al
as 1:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
Mausean Q.V. Carter
Defendant:
Bradley Butler, Edward Davis, C. McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Witherspoon v. Weber
as 1:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Edward Witherspoon
Defendant:
Ronald S Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
