Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Siler v. Monroe
as 23-7063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. SILER
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer J. WALDEN and Officer EDWIN LOPEZ
Defendant:
Officer MONROE, Officer JOHN DOE, Superintendent LEROY FIELDS and others
Lopez v. Universal Protection Service, LLC
as 3:2021cv00458
Defendant:
Universal Protection Services, LLC doing business as Allied Universal and Universal Protection Service, LLC doing business as Allied Universal
Plaintiff:
Edwin Lopez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family & Medical Leave Act
United States of America v. Tolentino
as 17-265
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Manuel Peguero-Franco, AKA Manny and Edwin Lopez Diaz, AKA Doctor
Defendant - Appellant:
Juan Tolentino, AKA Chamacho, AKA Ismael
Lopez v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv06514
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Edwin Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Tolentino
as 14-2639
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Manuel Peguero-Franco, AKA Manny and Edwin Lopez Diaz, AKA Doctor
Defendant - Appellant:
Juan Tolentino, AKA Chamacho, AKA Ismael
United States of America v. Tolentino (Lopez Diaz)
as 14-1680
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Juan Tolentino, AKA Chamacho, AKA Ismael and Manuel Peguero-Franco, AKA Manny
Defendant - Appellant:
Edwin Lopez Diaz, AKA Doctor
Lopez et al v. Eddie's Shoe Repair, Inc et al
as 1:2013cv07648
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Lopez and Edwin Lopez
Defendant:
Eddie's Shoe Repair, Inc and Eduardo Ardaix
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lopez v. Burris Logistics Co.
as 3:2012cv01039
Defendant:
Burris Logistics Co.
Plaintiff:
Edwin Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lopez v. Latin American Distributors Acquistion, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv01746
Plaintiff:
Edwin Lopez
Defendant:
Latin American Distributors Acquisition, LLC and Brooks Provisions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
