Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lieckly v. Little, et al.
as 1:2023cv00281
Defendant:
Bob Meyers, Brad Little, Mike Crapo and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Edwin Lieckly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prall v. Holm, et al.
as 1:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Edwin W. Prall, II and Edwin Prall, II
Defendant:
Kasey Holm, Rona Siegert, Kara Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmons v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00204
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Petitioner:
Edwin Dee Timmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Borjas v. Idaho Central Credit Union
as 4:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Idaho Central Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Edwin Borjas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bourquin v. Corizon Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00328
Defendant:
Corp Civic, Brent D. Reinke, John Does 1-4 and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Bourquin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timmons v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00403
Petitioner:
Edwin Dee Timmons
Respondent:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Kendall et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00330
Plaintiff:
Gary Kendall, Edwin Crosby III, Barbara Wright and others
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Depratment of Veterans Affairs and Eric Ken Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DeWitt v Walgreen Co
as 1:2011cv00263
Plaintiff:
Edwin M DeWitt
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and John or Jane Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stack et al v. Burks Taylor & Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00550
Plaintiff:
Michael Edwin Stack and Mary Kay Stack
Defendant:
Burks Taylor & Associates, LLC and John Matthews
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kimball v. State of Idaho
as 1:2009cv00485
Petitioner:
Edwin Everette Kimball
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
