Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Simeon Briggs v. A. Brockman, et al
as 21-1718
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIMEON JOEL BRIGGS
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER ENIGKT, A. BROCKMAN, Coordinator Psychologist and RACHAEL EIGENBRODE, Psychology Staff
Bralen Jordan v. David J. Ebbert, et al
as 21-1638
Defendant / Appellee:
BADRISCH, WATSON, Associate Program, T. CRAWFORD and others
Intervenor Defendant:
NURSE JEANA MITTERLING
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN L. JORDAN
Michael Gordon v. SIS Buebendorf, et al
as 19-3824
Defendant / Appellee:
EDINGER, C.D./M.D., RAJJOUB, Medical Doctor, GASS, Education Department and others
Defendant:
C.O. HURLEY, C.O. BARBELLA, C.O. GASS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE GORDON
In re: Michael Gordon
as 19-3474
Not Yet Classified:
HICKS, Case Manager, EDINGER, C.D./M.D., MALACHY E. MANNION and others
In re: Michael Gordon
as 19-3489
Not Yet Classified:
HICKS, Case Manager, EDINGER, C.D./M.D., MALACHY E. MANNION and others
In re: Michael Gordon
as 19-3490
Not Yet Classified:
HICKS, Case Manager, EDINGER, C.D./M.D., MALACHY E. MANNION and others
Briggs v. United States et al
as 3:2019cv01499
Plaintiff:
Simeon Joel Briggs
Defendant:
United States, Andrea Brockman, Jennifer Enigk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordon v. Ebbert et al
as 4:2019cv01472
Defendant:
Mr. Watson, K. Sorce, D. Andrew Edringer and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen L. Jordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROGERS v. USP LEWISBURG et al
as 1:2019cv01380
Defendant:
C. Moore, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. Earp, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER B. Mississigan and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy N. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. USP LEWISBURG et al
as 2:2019cv03537
Defendant:
C. MOORE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. EARP, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. HURLEY and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY N. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
