Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Elder v. Paul
as 3:2019cv00220
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Travis Elder
Respondent:
D. Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ORTIZ-LOPEZ et al v. DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 5:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
ELDER NEHEMIAS LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ, JOSE MARIA BARRIOS-IPUANA, JHAIR GENEROSO PATERNINA-CHRISTOPHER and others
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, LORETTA E. LYNCH and DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elder v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Denise Elder
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Grice v. City of Baldwyn, Mississippi et al
as 1:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joshua Grice
Defendant:
City of Baldwyn, Mississippi and Greg Elder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Price v. Elder et al
as 1:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
Tony J. Price
Defendant:
Greg Elder and The City of Baldwyn, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Floyd et al v. Elder et al
as 1:2014cv00061
Plaintiff:
Thomas Steve Floyd and Johnny Steen
Defendant:
Greg Elder , Troy Agnew and The City of Baldwyn, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meaders v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
Elders Meaders
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Trinity USA Operating, LLC v. Abercrombie
as 2:2011cv00246
Plaintiff:
Trinity USA Operating, LLC
Defendant:
Betty J. Allen, Ruby Jean Ambrose, Mattie Ruth Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Modley et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 4:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Modley, Nita Toy, Cleveland Amos and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
