Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Eldridge v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq00247
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Terry Eldridge
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eldridge v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq02224
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Terry Eldridge
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gleghorn v. Mika Logistics Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01357
Defendant:
Mika Logistics Inc. and Sergei
Plaintiff:
Julius Gleghorn, Eldridge Cherry, Ravinder Lalsandhu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
McCaffrey v. McAtee et al
as 3:2021cv03029
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Lisa Johnson, Mary Schoen and others
Plaintiff:
Hannah McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07479
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
O'Quinn v. Vanderhove et al
as 3:2020cv01245
Defendant:
C/O Martin, Eldridge, C/O Vanderhove and others
Plaintiff:
Chester O'Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcantel v. Eldridge et al
as 1:2020cv01163
Defendant:
Lieutenant Eldridge and Sergeant Hanlin
Plaintiff:
Shane Marcantel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcantel v. Eldridge et al
as 1:2020cv01164
Defendant:
Lieutenant Eldridge and Sergeant Hanlin
Plaintiff:
Shane Marcantel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Hammers et al
as 1:2019cv01220
Defendant:
. Mullens, . Fletcher, Justin Hammers and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eldrige et al v. US Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv03907
Defendant:
Protestivo & Associates P.C., James Kennedy, US Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Mary E Eldrige and Robert E Eldridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
