Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Hatten v. Elkin et al
as 2:2024cv01102
Plaintiff:
Arlene F. Hatten
Defendant:
Tom Elkin, John Hinton, Davis Homer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Elkins v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Brenda Elkins
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol,Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Elkins v. Franklin Medical Center, et al.
as 2:2022cv03705
Plaintiff:
David Elkins
Defendant:
Franklin Medical Center, Warden Pickaway Correctional Institution, Warden K. Jeter Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv02868
Defendant:
CR Bard, Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kennard Baker, Kirby Slupe, Estate of Larry Kious and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Boyer v. Clinton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
Tim Boyer
Defendant:
Clinton County Sheriff's Office, Lori Elkins, Ralph Fizer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Elkins v. Davol Inc., et al
as 1:2020cv00784
Defendant:
Davol Inc., and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
BRENDA ELKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elkins v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2020cv02934
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Shean Elkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Elkin v. C.R Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03559
Plaintiff:
CANDY ELKIN
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C R BARD and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elkins et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01195
Plaintiff:
Julie Elkins and Brian Elkins
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elkins v. Hudson et al
as 3:2017cv02179
Plaintiff:
David Elkins
Defendant:
Stuart Hudson, Andrew Eddy, Regional Nurse Administrator Eller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
