Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Ruiz v. Elko County Jail
as 3:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
Victor Ruiz
Defendant:
Elko County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Kendall et al
as 3:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Victor Ruiz
Defendant:
Kendall, Hatch, Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schomer et al v. Elko County et al
as 2:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
Dwayne L Schomer and Braylen Schomer
Defendant:
Elko County, Elko County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Aitor Narvaiza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swallow v. Elko County et al
as 3:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ronald Swallow
Defendant:
Elko County, West Wendover City Police Dept., Miguel Pantelakis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berumen v. Elko County Sheriff Dept.
as 3:2022cv00455
Plaintiff:
Joseph Manuel Berumen
Defendant:
Elko County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Elko County et al
as 3:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Wade Alan Knight
Defendant:
Elko County, Aitor Narvaiza, Lt Adrian Parry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. City of Elko et al
as 3:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
Wade Alan Knight
Defendant:
Elko, City of, Ty Trouten, Andrew Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davitt v. Elko County Sheriff
as 3:2022cv00381
Petitioner:
Michael Thomas Davitt
Respondent:
Elko County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davitt v. Elko County Jail
as 3:2022cv00355
Petitioner:
Michael Thomas Davitt
Respondent:
Elko County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
