Cases 11 - 16 of 16
JENKINS v. ALLIED PACKING & SUPPLY, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv80097
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. JENKINS
Defendant:
ALLIED PACKING & SUPPLY, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, ALFA LAVAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Box et al v. Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00800
Defendant:
Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc., Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc., A.W. Chesterton, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carla Box, Kermit Francis and Keith Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
DYER et al v. ALFA LAVAL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv63298
Plaintiff:
JERRY DYER, JERRY DYER, JERRY DYER and others
Defendant:
ALFA LAVAL, INC., ANCHOR DARLING VALUE COMPANY, ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Jenkins v. Allied Packing & Supply, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01671
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jenkins
Defendant:
Allied Packing & Supply, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
SIMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv60059
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND B SIMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON, INC., AMERICAN INVESTORS, LLC and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
DURABLA MANUFACTORING COMPANY
ThirdParty Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., THE ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PATTERSON et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv60060
Plaintiff:
STEVEN R PATTERSON and PAMELA F PATTERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN INVESTORS, LLC and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
DURABLA MANUFACTURING COMPANY
ThirdParty Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., THE ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
