Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 1:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. Teton Springs Operations LLC
as 4:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ellis
Defendant:
Teton Springs Operations LLC doing business as Bronze Buffalo Sporting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dicke v. Somoza
as 1:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Lynn Dicke
Defendant:
Ellie Somoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Veenstra, et al. v. Little, et al.
as 1:2021cv00341
Plaintiff:
Albert Pete Veenstra, III, Kent Ellis, Charles Lynn Sacolick and others
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho State Board of Correction Members, Director IDOC Josh Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meiller v. Frederick, et al.
as 1:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
Brandie Meiller
Defendant:
Ladeene Bedford Frederick, David P Hamilton, Karen Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howe, et al. v. Roberts, et al.
as 1:2021cv00175
Defendant:
Bridget Bade, Milan D Smith, Srikanth Srinivason and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis, Ebenezer K. Howe, IV and Robert McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson, et al. v. Canyon County, Idaho, et al.
as 1:2019cv00364
Defendant:
Pam White, Canyon County, Idaho, Leslie Van Beek and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Ellis, Rene Whitneck, Tracy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Connell et al v. McClure et al
as 1:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Rachel Connell and Richard Connell
Defendant:
Andrew McClure , Kevin Ellis and Lincoln County Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Atencio et al
as 1:2017cv00106
Petitioner:
Mark Lee Ellis
Respondent:
Henry Atencio and Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
