Cases 31 - 40 of 40
USA v. Reginald Ellison, Sr.
as 09-6078
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
REGINALD ELLISON, SR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. Michael Ellison
as 09-5167
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL ELLISON
Jackson v. Ellison et al
as 3:2008mc00280
Plaintiff:
Damien Jackson
Defendant:
Malissa Ellison, Tennessee Department of Correction, State of Tennessee and others
Aberasturi et al v. Raymond James Financial Services Inc et al
as 1:2008cv00496
Plaintiff:
Claire R. Aberasturi, Claire R. Aberasturi, Teddy W. Adkins and others
Defendant:
Raymond James Financial Services Inc, Raymond James Financial Services Inc, Raymond James Financial Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. Curtis Ellison
as 08-1746
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CURTIS E. ELLISON
Fitzgibbons et al v. Cook and Thorburn County Drainage Districts et al
as 1:2008cv00165
Plaintiff:
Sheila Fitzgibbons, Richard Ellison and Aquatic Sports, Ltd.
Defendant:
Cook and Thorburn County Drainage Districts, Hancock County Drainage District and Patrick E. Lindemann
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. Ellison
as 07-1945
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CURTIS ELLISON, aka Curtis Smith, aka Chauncey Copeland
United States of America v. Ellison
as 2:2007x50587
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Ellison and Michael Ellison
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
United States of America et al v. Visiting Physician Association et al
as 1:2004cv00220
Plaintiff:
United States of America and David M. Ellison, M.D.
Defendant:
Visiting Physician Association and Wayne Victor Arnold, D.O.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
