Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Murphy v. Belton, City of et al
as 8:2023cv01766
Plaintiff:
Shane Murphy
Defendant:
Belton, City of, Belton Police Department, City of, James Richey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Meadows v. Freeman et al
as 8:2023cv00754
Plaintiff:
William David Meadows
Defendant:
Lieutenant Kennethia Freeman, Captain Hardy Sims, Sediq Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Folks v. Ellison
as 1:2021cv00105
Defendant:
Richard Roundtree, Richmond County, Aiken County E.M.S. and others
Plaintiff:
Jerrald Anthony Folks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Roach et al v. White et al
as 7:2020cv03601
Defendant:
Office of the Union County Sheriff, Samuel W White, Union County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Emily K Harkins and Casey A Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
South Carolina, State of v. Ellison
as 1:2018cv00300
Defendant:
Sharon Bush Ellison
Plaintiff:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. USA
as 4:2016cv02418
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ellison Lakell Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ellison et al v. Proffit et al
as 4:2016cv00847
Plaintiff:
Michelle Ellison and David Ellison
Defendant:
Brian Proffit, John Does, Glen Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. Fate et al
as 0:2015cv04516
Plaintiff:
Daniel R McClain
Defendant:
Lefford Fate, Samuel Soltis, John B Tomarchio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ellison v. Eagleton et al
as 1:2010cv02587
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ellison
Defendant:
Willie L Eagleton , Steven Nolan , Annie Mae Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellison v. South Carolina, State of
as 2:2010cv01458
Petitioner:
William Ellison
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
