Cases 1 - 10 of 11
ELMORE v. STATES DEPARTMENT OF SOUTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CHARLES ELMORE, III
Defendant:
STATES DEPARTMENT OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ROSE BAWYIN, PAM DRIGGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TRUDEL v. DILMORE et al
as 1:2021cv03162
Defendant:
HUGH DAVID O'DONNELL, WYNN ANDREW HARDING, PHYLLIS ARMATROUT WONG and others
Plaintiff:
MARY TRUDEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRUNS et al v. USAA et al
as 1:2020cv00501
Defendant:
MARK A. DAVIS, ROBERT WILKIE, DALTON BRYANT, SR. and others
Plaintiff:
JENNY BRUNS and JEREMY BRUNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS et al v. LAWRENCE et al
as 1:2019cv02886
Plaintiff:
XIU JIAN SUN and CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS
Defendant:
JOSHUA LYNN ROGERS, R. CRAIG LAWRENCE, JESSIE K. LIU and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00915
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SPORT v. CAPOLLA et al
as 1:2008cv01250
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SPORT
Defendant:
JORDAN CAPOLLA, WILBERT WASHINGTON, II and CHADWICK WASHINGTON MORIARTY ELMORE & BUNN, PC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BALL et al
as 1:2007mc00085
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTWUAN BALL
Respondent:
XAVIER ELMORE
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceeding
WELCH v. ATKINS et al
as 1:2007cv00057
Plaintiff:
ELMORE WELCH
Defendant:
JEFFREY ATKINS and ANN MCCAMEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
