Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Martinez v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv03891
Plaintiff:
Eloy Martinez
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Gonzalez v. The City of San Benito, Texas et al
as 1:2020cv00211
Defendant:
Manuel Cisneros, The City of San Benito, Texas, Michael Galvan and others
Plaintiff:
Astrid Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Cruz et al v. JJ's Asian Fusion Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv09098
Defendant:
JJ's Asian Fusion Inc. doing business as JJ's Fusion, Hu Doe and Zi Jie Lin
Plaintiff:
Marcos Cruz and Eloy Martinez Bautista
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cruz et al v. JJ's Asian Fusion Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05120
Defendant:
JJ's Asian Fusion Inc. doing business as JJ's Fusion, Hu Doe and Zi Jie Lin
Plaintiff:
Marcos Cruz and Eloy Martinez Bautista
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
In re: Eloy Martinez-Dempwolf
as 16-14532
Petitioner:
In re: ELOY MARTINEZ-DEMPWOLF
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Eloy Mendoza-Martinez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-60541
Petitioner:
ELOY MENDOZA-MARTINEZ, also known as Eloy Martinez Mendoza
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Calonge v. Super Nice STS, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv22763
Plaintiff:
Marc A. Calonge
Defendant:
Super Nice STS, Inc. and Eloy Martinez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Martinez v. Geovera Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 7:2014cv00364
Plaintiff:
Eloy Martinez
Defendant:
Geovera Specialty Insurance Company and Mark Lindoerfer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Joseph v. Super Nice STS, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv20994
Plaintiff:
Joseph V. Joseph
Defendant:
Super Nice STS, Inc. , Eloy Martinez , Raymond Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Martinez-Dempwolf v. United States of America
as 8:2012cv00886
Plaintiff:
Eloy Martinez-Dempwolf
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
