Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Acevedo v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07534
Plaintiff:
Elsa Acevedo
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc. and Midland Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Acevedo v. National Credit Adjusters, LLC
as 1:2016cv00163
Plaintiff:
Elsa Acevedo
Defendant:
National Credit Adjusters, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In Re: Cheerios Marketing
as 12-3943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELSA ACEVEDO, EDWARD MYERS and CLAIRE M. THEODORE
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HOBIN CHOI, CHARITY HUEY and JEFFERY STEVENS
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL MILLS, INC, a Delaware Corporation
Gomez et al v. Service Employees International Union Local 87 et al
as 3:2010cv01888
Plaintiff:
Marta Gomez , Ramona Hernandez , Maria Herrera and others
Defendant:
Service Employees International Union Local 87 and Service Employees International Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gomez et al v. Service Employees International Union Local 87 et al
as 4:2010cv01888
Plaintiff:
Marta Gomez , Ramona Hernandez , Maria Herrera and others
Defendant:
Service Employees International Union Local 87 and Service Employees International Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rodriguez et al v. Service Employees International Union Local 87 et al
as 3:2010cv01377
Plaintiff:
Maxima Carolina Rodriguez , Elsa Acevedo , Olga Loaiza and others
Defendant:
Service Employees International Union Local 87, Service Employees International Union, Olga Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
MYERS et al v. GENERAL MILLS, INC.
as 2:2009cv02413
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MYERS, EDWARD MYERS, ELSA ACEVEDO and others
Defendant:
GENERAL MILLS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MYERS et al v. GENERAL MILLS, INC.
as 3:2009cv02413
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MYERS and ELSA ACEVEDO
Defendant:
GENERAL MILLS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
