Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Adeyinka v. State of Texas
as 4:2023cv03636
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Adeyinka
Defendant:
State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Adeyinka v. Spring Branch Memorial Hospital et al
as 4:2023cv03140
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Adeyinka
Defendant:
Spring Branch Memorial Hospital and Texas Health And Human Services
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Adeyinka v. Spring Branch Memorial Hospital et al
as 4:2023cv02962
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Adeyinka
Defendant:
Spring Branch Memorial Hospital and Texas Health And Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Adeyinka v. Yates et al
as 4:2022cv04238
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Adeyinka
Defendant:
Philip Yates, Sean Yates and Ladonna Yates
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Adeyinka v. May et al
as 4:2022cv02216
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Adeyinka
Defendant:
Sarah May, Harris County Courts and Micheal May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adeyinka v. Armstrong et al
as 4:2022cv02219
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Adeyinka
Defendant:
Armstrong, Brady Barrs, C. Aquilera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv01286
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adeyinka v. Texas Department of Justice et al
as 4:2018cv02782
Defendant:
Parole Board, City of Houston, Texas Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Adeyinka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ADEYINKA v. HOUSTON TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
as 4:2018cv02753
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Adeyinka
Defendant:
HOUSTON TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adeyinka v. Demosend et al
as 4:2018cv02542
Defendant:
Gilles Paires, Eric Tony, Patrick Zelnik and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Adeyinka
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
