Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bownes v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Bownes
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Jim Hood, Ralph Doxey and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bownes v. Hood et al
as 3:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Bownes
Defendant:
Jim Hood, Ralph Doxey, Raymond Byrd and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bownes v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Bownes
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Jim Hood, Ralph Doxey and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zachary Johnson v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 17-60447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZACHARY JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, JOHNNIE DENMARK, MARY DIXON and others
Nelson v. Sturdivant et al
as 3:2015cv00441
Plaintiff:
Sidney Chappel Nelson
Defendant:
Robert Sturdivant, Emmit L. Sparkman, Tom Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
John C. Mitchell
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher L. Epps, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bevill v. Epps et al
as 3:2012cv00537
Plaintiff:
Randy Bevill
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmit L. Sparkman, Unknown Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Sparkman
as 1:2011cv00382
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Mayfield, Jr.
Defendant:
Emmit L. Sparkman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brownlee v. Adams et al
as 3:2011cv00074
Plaintiff:
James Astor Brownlee
Defendant:
Wayland Adams and Emmit L. Sparkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Warnock et al
as 4:2010cv00128
Plaintiff:
Levonzel Anderson
Defendant:
Shannon Warnock, Emmit L. Sparkman, Bartley Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
