Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Greenwood v. Epps et al
as 2:2011cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gregory Thomas Greenwood
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Ronald King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Kelly et al
as 2:2010cv00271
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Davis
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly, Ronald King, Regina Hancock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2010cv00139
Plaintiff:
Laveal McGhee
Defendant:
Emmitt L. Sparkman, E. R. Moody, Albert First and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Caskey et al
as 4:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
Aubrey "DOC" Hicks
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Bartholomew Grimes, Robert Grubb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Christopher B. Epps et al
as 5:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Reginald O. Simpson
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Jacqualyn Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Epps et al
as 4:2010cv00011
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Anthony Hicks
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Dale Caskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Branch v. Sparkman
as 4:2009cv00110
Plaintiff:
Alex T. Branch
Defendant:
Emmitt L. Sparkman, Faye Noel, Verlena Flagg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00548
Plaintiff:
Antonio Byrd
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Haley Barbour, Christopher B. Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
McCray v. Epps et al
as 1:2008cv00296
Plaintiff:
Ronnie C. McCray
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Preston Goff, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carney v. Sparkman
as 08-60828
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES CARNEY
Respondent - Appellee:
EMMITT L SPARKMAN, Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
