Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Malave-Sykes v. Endicott Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv01215
Plaintiff:
Joshua Malave-Sykes
Defendant:
Endicott Police Department, Officer E. Riegel, Linda Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Brink v. Village of Endicott et al
as 3:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Thomas Brink
Defendant:
Village of Endicott, Village of Endicott Police Department, Village of Endicott Police Officer O'Hearn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Bergman
as 20-571
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Malcolm Washington
Defendant / Appellee:
David E. Butler, Esq., Attorney At Law, Ellis Erwin, Chief Inspector, Endicott Police Department, Sophie Bergman, Assistant District Attorney and others
Walker v. Village Court et al
as 3:2017cv00390
Plaintiff:
Alfred Marion Walker
Defendant:
Village Court, The State of New York, Village of Endicott and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Neilson v. Endicott Police Department et al
as 3:2015cv00825
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Neilson
Defendant:
Endicott Police Department, Dunham, Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nash v. The County of Broome
as 12-1073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lester Nash
Defendant:
The County of Broome, Dwayne J. Smith, Police Officer, Jennifer Quinn, Police Officer and others
Defendant - Appellee:
The Village of Endicott, The Endicott Police Department, Michael Kaminsky, Detective Sergeant and others
McHenry v. Solomon
as 11-823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kim I. McHenry
Defendant - Appellee:
R. Solomon, Police Officer, Endicott Police Department, J. Holleran, Police Lieutenant, Endicott Police Department and J. Sheerin, Police Captain, Endicott Police Department
Powers v. Village of Endicott et al
as 3:2009cv00744
Plaintiff:
Glen Powers
Defendant:
Village of Endicott and Endicott Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
