Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Epps v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv04285
Plaintiff:
Antonio Epps, Jr.
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Epps v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02490
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Antonio Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Epps v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01636
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Antonio Johan Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Epps v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00110
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Kawanta Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Epps v. C.R. Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01547
Plaintiff:
Kawanta Devon Epps
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Epps v. CVS Health Corporation
as 2:2018cv01274
Plaintiff:
Vivian Epps
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company v. Lundgren Homes Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00297
Plaintiff:
Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lundgren Homes Incorporated, Darrell Epps, Tracy Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Vaca v. La Paz County Detention Center et al
as 2:2016cv01329
Plaintiff:
Marcos Vaca
Defendant:
La Paz County Detention Center, Unknown Epps, Unknown Salano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaca v. La Paz County Detention Center et al
as 2:2016cv01059
Defendant:
Richard Epps, Unknown Egale, Unknown Party and others
Plaintiff:
Marcos Vaca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weirich v. Epps et al
as 2:2016cv01013
Defendant:
Richard Epps, Tammy Hiatt, Larry Irwin and others
Plaintiff:
Mathew Weirich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
