Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rochelle Daniel v. Equable Ascent Financial, LLC, et al
as 14-2627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROCHELLE DANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
EQUABLE ASCENT FINANCIAL, LLC and VELOCITY PORTFOLIO GROUP
Daniel v. Equable Ascent Financial, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv11117
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Daniel
Defendant:
Equable Ascent Financial, LLC and Velocity Portfolio Group
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Simmons v. Equable Ascent Financial LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00392
Plaintiff:
Elmer Simmons
Defendant:
Equable Ascent Financial LLC, Jeff D Hasenmiller and Mendelson Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Molloy v. Equable Ascent Financial LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00039
Plaintiff:
Carol A. Molloy
Defendant:
Equable Ascent Financial LLC, Jeff D. Hasenmiller and Finkelstein Kern Steinberg & Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Marek v. Equable Ascent Financial LLC et al (TV2)
as 3:2012cv00220
Plaintiff:
Angela Marek
Defendant:
Equable Ascent Financial LLC, Jeff D Hasenmiller and Law Offices of Barry J. Gammons
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pressly v. Equable Ascent Financial LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00553
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pressly
Defendant:
Equable Ascent Financial LLC and Jeff Hasenmiller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Murphy v. Equable Ascent Financial LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00335
Plaintiff:
Ellis Murphy
Defendant:
Equable Ascent Financial LLC, Jeff Hasenmiller and Mendelson Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
