Cases 11 - 20 of 90
Ruppert v. NM Department of Corrections, et al
as 14-2123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES KEVIN RUPPERT
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GUADALUPE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Guzman v. Bravo et al
as 1:2014cv00425
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Guzman
Respondent:
Erasmo Bravo and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruppert v. NM Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 14-2030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES KEVIN RUPPERT
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GUADALUPE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GEO GROUP, INC. and others
TG et al v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
T G , M S , B C and others
Defendant:
Geo Group, Inc., Corizon, Inc., Mark Elliot Walden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gonzales v. Bravo, et al
as 13-2215
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND M. GONZALES
Respondent - Appellee:
ERASMO BRAVO and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Musacco v. Walden, et al.
as 1:2013cv01053
Plaintiff:
Beau J Musacco
Defendant:
Mark Elliot Walden, Gregg Marcantel, Jerry Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
J.U. et al v. The Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00968
Plaintiff:
J.U. and R.S.
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Inc., Corizon, Inc., Erasmo Bravo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Bravo et al
as 1:2013cv00825
Petitioner:
Anthony Wallace
Respondent:
Erasmo Bravo and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holt v. LNU et al
as 1:2013cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jimmy J. Holt
Defendant:
FNU LNU, Cathy Catanach, FNU Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ysasi v. Bravo et al
as 1:2013cv00654
Petitioner:
Peter Mendez Ysasi
Respondent:
Erasmo Bravo and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
