Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Chatman v. Am Pm et al
as 2:2018cv01608
Defendant:
Am-Pm Corporation and Am Pm
Plaintiff:
Eric Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Chatman v. Kmart Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv07232
Defendant:
Kmart by CBS in LA and Kmart Corporation
Plaintiff:
Eric Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA
as 3:2018cv01913
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, USA
Plaintiff:
Eric Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Chatman v. Stratosphere Hotel and Casino
as 2:2018cv01511
Defendant:
Stratosphere Hotel and Casino
Plaintiff:
Eric Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. State of California et al
as 3:2018cv01870
Defendant:
State of California and CDC
Plaintiff:
Eric Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Eric Chatman v. Citibank et al
as 2:2018cv06347
Respondent:
Citibank and Citibank Corporation
Petitioner:
Eric Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. Mobil Gas Station et al
as 3:2018cv01675
Defendant:
City of National City, Escondido Transit, Walmart in SD and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Chatman v. Mirage Hotel and Casino Resort et al
as 2:2018cv01312
Defendant:
Budweiser Company, Mirage Hotel and Casino Resort, Stratosphere Hotel and Casino and Resort and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. Apts Behind Indoor Swap Meet in Oceanside and Indoor Swap Meet to et al
as 3:2018cv01606
Defendant:
Solana Beach Lifeguards and Vista Court, Quility Chevrolet in Escondido, Recylcing Place Across from Fire Dept. in Oceanside and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Chatman v. Mclarren in Beverly Hills et al
as 3:2018cv01605
Defendant:
Porshe in El Segundo or LAX, Discover Infinity, Jack Powell Cadillac and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
