Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Dixon v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04847
Plaintiff:
Brian Dixon
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., Eric Fuller, Max Fuller and others
Johnson v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04751
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., Max Fuller, Jon Beizer and others
Thompson v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04750
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., Max Fuller, Jon Beizer and others
Bushansky v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04393
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., Eric Fuller, Max Fuller and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03272
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Henderson et al v. Irons et al
as 3:2019cv05800
Plaintiff:
Boyd Henderson and Celeste Henderson
Defendant:
Brett Irons, Eric Fuller & Associates, LLC and Eric Fuller & Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stein v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00098
Defendant:
Max Fuller, US XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC., Jason Grear and others
Plaintiff:
LEWIS STEIN, Charles Clowdis and Bryan K. Robbins
Petitioner:
Excavators Union Local 731 Pension Fund and Deirdre Terry
Intervenor Plaintiff:
CARLOS GARCIA and USX INVESTOR GROUP
Smith v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00078
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Max Fuller, Jason Grear and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fuller v. State of Colorado, The
as 1:2017cv01738
Defendant:
State of Colorado, The
Plaintiff:
Michael Eric Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whipple v. Tennessee Board of Paroles et al
as 1:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
Robert Zenus Whipple, III
Defendant:
Tennessee Board of Paroles, Zane Duncan, Gary Faulcon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
