Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00394
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Villanueva-Forero v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv01154
Plaintiff:
Andrea O. Villanueva-Forero
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Ronald C. Machen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Propst v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00089
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
U.S. Attorney Timothy J. Heaphy, US Atty Gen Eric H. Holder, Jr. and SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Angela S. Propst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00249
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1421
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barrie v. Lucero et al
as 1:2011cv01410
Petitioner:
Abdulai Barrie
Respondent:
Enrique Lucero , David L. Simons, John T. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Meadows v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00108
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
U.S. Attorney Tim Heaphy, U.S. Attorney Genera Eric H. Holder, Jr. and SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Preston Meadows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
