Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00035
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv06105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC. et al v. THE HONORABLE ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
as 2:2009cv04607
Plaintiff:
FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC., FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC., AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MEDIA PHOTOGRAPHERS, INC. and others
Defendant:
THE HONORABLE ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
QUINTANA
as 2:2009mc00171
Petitioner:
JOSE QUINTANA
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND IMMIGRATION SERVICE HARLINGEN, TX 78590 and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GEN. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04068
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
