Cases 41 - 50 of 122
Maisano v. Holder et al
as 4:2013cv00328
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
Eric Himpton Holder, Jr., Trinity Correctional Food Services Incorporated and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIASCOS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2013cv00634
Plaintiff:
NIVALDO RIASCOS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Maisano v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2013cv00285
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Charles L Ryan, Janice K Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEL ROSARIO v. HOLDER
as 1:2013cv00534
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN DEL ROSARIO
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RAMOS v. HOLDER
as 1:2013cv00548
Plaintiff:
RAUL C. RAMOS
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARMOLEJOS v. HOLDER
as 1:2013cv00519
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MARMOLEJOS
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maisano v. Ryan et al
as 4:2013cv00256
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, T Schroeder, Linda Forester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00465
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WATTLETON v. HOLDER
as 1:2013cv00375
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DONOGHUE v. OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY et al
as 1:2013cv00256
Plaintiff:
JAMES PATRICK DONOGHUE
Defendant:
OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
