Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01148
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Philip King v. US Dept of Veterans Affairs, et al
as 12-60835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP M. KING
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ERIC K. SHINSEKI, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States Of America et al v. Crowley
as 1:2012cv00814
Respondent:
Chad Elington Crowley
Petitioner:
Eric K. Shinseki and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv02214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States Of America et al v. Amber Roy
as 1:2012cv00723
Respondent:
Amber Roy
Petitioner:
Eric K. Shinseki and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
