Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00645
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brice v. Shinseki et al
as 6:2014cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jeffery L. Brice
Defendant:
VA Police Chief Thomas Carnes and Sec of Vet Affairs Eric K. Shinseki
Notice Only Party:
U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Copenhaver v. Shinseki
as 3:2013cv00195
Plaintiff:
Walter A. Copenhaver
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00177
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
