Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ANDREWS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv01443
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RUSSELL ANDREWS, SR.
Defendant:
CO1 PELUS, COIIII SHEEDER, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BOLTZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2018cv02254
Petitioner:
ROBERT P. BOLTZ, SR.
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ERIC P. BUSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REXROTH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv00362
Petitioner:
WILLIAM E. REXROTH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ERIC P. BUSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOLTZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv00363
Petitioner:
ROBERT P. BOLTZ, SR.
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ERIC P. BUSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FARROW v. BUSH et al
as 2:2017cv01169
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS FARROW
Defendant:
ERIC P. BUSH, EVANICHKO, MARSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CAPLE v. BUSH et al
as 2:2017cv03989
Petitioner:
FRANK CAPLE
Respondent:
ERIC P. BUSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WINN v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv01117
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE WINN
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION PINE GROVE, SUPT. ERIC P. BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. BUSH et al
as 2:2017cv00073
Petitioner:
TOLA ROSS
Respondent:
ERIC P. BUSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WINN v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2016cv00284
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE WINN
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, JOHN E. WETZEL, CORRECTIONAL CARE SOLUTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. BUSH et al
as 2:2014cv00686
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MITCHELL
Defendant:
ERIC P. BUSH and C/O WESSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
