Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Flatiron Crane Operating Company, LLC v. Stull
as 2:2024cv01918
Plaintiff:
Flatiron Crane Operating Company, LLC
Defendant:
Eric W Stull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Flatiron Crane Operating Company, LLC v. Stull
as 5:2024cv01918
Plaintiff:
Flatiron Crane Operating Company, LLC
Defendant:
Eric W Stull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Skurka v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
Eric W. Skurka
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GERMAN v. TICE
as 5:2023cv00336
Petitioner:
ERIC GERMAN
Respondent:
ERIC W. TICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cribbs v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv01950
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Elizabeth Cribbs
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, George Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. TICE
as 2:2022cv03747
Petitioner:
DENNIS MOORE
Respondent:
ERIC W. TICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shay v. Wahl et al
as 3:2022cv01157
Petitioner:
Eric W. Shay
Respondent:
Mark Wahl and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CRIBBS v. TICE
as 2:2022cv00320
Petitioner:
KYLE DAVEY CRIBBS
Respondent:
ERIC W. TICE
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PEARSON v. LITTLE et al
as 3:2021cv00206
Plaintiff:
ISAAC BILAL PEARSON and ISSAC BILAL PEARSON
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, ERIC W. TICE, Sergeant WOZNIAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
