Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LeBaron v. Elliott, et al
as 14-2234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN MARQUIS LEBARON
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, JAMIE RACINSKI, REBECCA LUBELCZYK, Dr. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERRY ELLIOTT, WILLIAM BATES, GARY RODEN and others
Interested Party:
KEITH ASHBY, NICHOLAS BASEY, ERICK GOMEZ and others
In Re: Lebaron
as 13-2286
Petitioner:
NATHAN MARQUIS LEBARON
:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, JAMIE RACINSKI, REBECCA LUBELCZYK, Dr. and others
Respondent:
SHERRY ELLIOTT, WILLIAM BATES, GARY RODEN and others
Movant - Interested Party:
KEITH ASHBY, ANDREW J. MALLORY, JR., RICHARD MAYHEW and others
LeBaron v. Clarke, et al
as 12-1688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN MARQUIS LEBARON
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, JAMIE RACINSKI, LUBELCZYK, Dr. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERRY ELLIOTT, BILL BATES, GARY RODEN and others
Movant - Interested Party:
KEITH ASHBY, ANDREW J. MALLORY, JR., RICHARD MAYHEW and others
Hudson v. O'Brien, et al
as 11-1135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAC S. HUDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN O'BRIEN, ERNEST J. THERIEN, JUSTIN PRORIO and others
Gaskins, et al v. Marshall, et al
as 09-1566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY B. GASKINS
Plaintiff:
ROY JUANDOO, GUS SWAFFORD, DERICK TYLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, Superintendent, MCI Cedar Junction, BEVERLY VEGLAS, Librarian, MARY JO SWEENEY, Director of Library Services and others
Schmitt v. Smith, et al
as 08-1292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH P. SCHMITT
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY SMITH, WILLIAM J. GROSSI, PETER ALLEN and others
Schmitt v. Mulvey, et al
as 08-1286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH P. SCHMITT
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM J. GROSSI, PETER ALLEN, MICHAEL T. MALONEY and others
Gaskins et al v. Marshall et al
as 1:2007cv10507
Plaintiff:
Tony B. Gaskins
Defendant:
John Marshall, Beverly Veglas, Mary Jo Sweeney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
