Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Scott et al v. Orange Lake Country Club, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00026
Plaintiff:
Jackie L. Scott and Jodie S. Scott
Defendant:
Orange Lake Country Club, Inc. , Jose Rangel, Ernesto Aviles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. City of Knoxville, Tennessee et al (TWP2)
as 3:2015cv00292
Plaintiff:
Ernesto D Rodriguez
Defendant:
City of Knoxville, Tennessee , Thomas A Thurman , Fredrick R Kimber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. The Thirsty Turtle 1 et al
as 3:2014cv01415
Plaintiff:
Justin Wade Allen
Defendant:
The Thirsty Turtle 1 and Ernesto Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chaves v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2013cv00498
Plaintiff:
Hugo Ernesto Chaves
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Bank of America, Corp. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chaves v. CWA
as 3:2012cv00589
Plaintiff:
Hugo Ernesto Chaves
Defendant:
CWA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Chaves v. AT&T (TV1)
as 3:2012cv00080
Plaintiff:
Hugo Ernesto Chaves
Defendant:
AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Campos v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2011cv01069
Plaintiff:
Ernesto R. Campos
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company , Rehab America, Inc., Group Long Term Disability Insurance Plan and Rehab America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Renteria-Villegas et al v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County et al
as 3:2011cv00218
Plaintiff:
Daniel Renteria-Villegas and David Ernesto Gutierrez-Turcios
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
