Cases 1 - 10 of 1,796
Li v. Roblox Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv03484
Plaintiff:
Eugene Li
Defendant:
Roblox Corp., David Baszucki, Michael Guthrie and others
Eugene William Hillman v. Warden
as 5:2024cv01175
Petitioner:
Eugene William Hillman
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Eugene Bowermaster v. Corporal Luis et al
as 2:2024cv04832
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Bowermaster
Defendant:
Corparal Luis and Deputy Navarette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
(PC) James v. Sacramento County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01585
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Sacramento County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) James v. Sacramento County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01511
Petitioner:
Ronald Eugene James
Respondent:
Sacramento County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee Michael Thompson v. Luna Innovations Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv04068
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Thompson
Defendant:
Luna Innovations Incorporated, Scott A. Graeff, Eugene J. Nestro and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Carr v. Redwood Credit Union et al
as 3:2024cv02700
Plaintiff:
Deaudry Eugene Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Redwood Credit Union, Kim Odeh, Nguyen Fong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
