Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Loudermill v. Schroer
as 2:2024cv02128
Plaintiff:
Denton Eugene Loudermill, Jr.
Defendant:
Nicholas Benjamin Schroer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Loudermill v. Hoskins
as 2:2024cv02127
Plaintiff:
Denton Eugene Loudermill, Jr.
Defendant:
Denny L. Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Loudermill v. Brattin
as 2:2024cv02126
Plaintiff:
Denton Eugene Loudermill, Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Ray Brattin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Loudermill v. Burchett
as 2:2024cv02109
Plaintiff:
Denton Eugene Loudermill, Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Floyd Burchett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hill v. Yockers et al
as 6:2023cv01258
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hill and Aaron Eugene Hill
Defendant:
Lori L. Yockers, Marcie Martinez, Tonya Keys and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Hill v. Yockers et al
as 6:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hill and Aaron Eugene Hill
Defendant:
Lori L. Yockers, Marcie Martinez, Tonya Keys and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
James v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2023cv03214
Petitioner:
Ronald Eugene James
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Edwards v. United States Department of Justice
as 2:2023cv02306
Plaintiff:
Steven Eugene Edwards
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hollingsworth v. Smith
as 5:2023cv03163
Petitioner:
Lucas Eugene Blaine Hollingsworth
Respondent:
Laura Kelly and Danny Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hollingsworth v. Smith et al
as 5:2023cv03165
Plaintiff:
Lucas Eugene Blaine Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Danile Smith, Charoltt Westhoff, Kalab Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
