Cases 1 - 10 of 200
Martin v. Gilley et al
as 6:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Adam Eugene Martin
Defendant:
Baker, Baker, Asher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hogan v. Edmonson County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Hogan
Defendant:
Edmonson County Sheriff Department and Tim Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. Logan County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Defendant:
Elsie Skipworth and Logan County Jail
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Hogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Gilley
as 6:2024cv00100
Respondent:
Warden Gilley
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Warden USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00090
Respondent:
Warden USP McCreary
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Warden USP McCreary
as 3:2024cv00315
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Respondent:
Warden USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sisco v. USA
as 7:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Eugene Sisco, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hayes v. Barthuly et al
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Harold Eugene Hayes
Defendant:
Brad Barthuly, Devin Nielsen, Alysta Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Green
as 3:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Eugene Lamont Baker
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Green
as 0:2023cv00110
Petitioner:
Eugene Lamont Baker
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
